Three laboratories involving researchers from the University of Arizona, Oxford University, and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology contributed to the 1988 study, which was carried out under the auspices of the British Museum. The findings of this new team are that the 1988 test results were unreliable. After a 2017 Freedom of Information (FOI) request, a new team of researchers gained access to the original data used for the 1988 test. The implication was clear: The shroud was a medieval forgery. In 1988 radiocarbon tests on the Shroud of Turin dated the cloth to between 12. This latest two-year study was headed and funded by French independent researcher Tristan Casabianca, with a team of Italian researchers and scientists: Emanuela Marinelli, who has written extensively about the shroud Giuseppe Pernagallo, data analyst and senior tutor at the University of Catania, Italy and Benedetto Torrisi, associate professor of economic statistics at the University of Catania. But I don't think they've done anything of the sort.A new French-Italian study on the Shroud of Turin throws doubt on what many thought was the definitive dating of the cloth believed by millions to be the burial cloth of Jesus Christ. that the image was formed by a burst of UV energy so intense it could only have been supernatural. "There are no chemical or physical methods known which can account for the totality of the image, nor can any combination of physical, chemical, biological or medical circumstances explain the image adequately," they said, according to the Telegraph.Ī professor of chemistry at Pavia University, Luigi Garlaschelli, shared with The Independent: "The implications are. The leader of the project, Prof Paolo Di Lazzaro, explained that their research was based purely on the scientific evidence at hand and left theological interpretations up to the "conscience of individuals."īetween 19, a group of 31 American scientists, called the Shroud of Turin Research Project, conducted 120 hours of X-ray and ultraviolet tests that arrived to the same conclusion. is impossible to obtain in a laboratory," the experts said. "The double image (front and back) of a scourged and crucified man, barely visible on the linen cloth of the Shroud of Turin, has many physical and chemical characteristics that are so particular that the staining. Radiocarbon tests conducted in 1988 in Arizona, Oxford and Zurich seemed to prove that theory to be true, but were disputed due to claims that fibers from the cloth were used around that time period simply to repair the shroud, which would explain the skewed findings, The Telegraph reported.Īttempts in the past had been made to replicate the relic in order to prove that it is a fake, and although scientists from Italy's National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Development managed to create such a duplicate, they concluded that it would be impossible for anyone to have done the same with technology available in the Middle Ages: However, critics insist the shroud in question is a forgery created in the Middle Ages, somewhere between 12. The ancient 14-foot long piece of cloth is said to hold remarkable imprints of a crucified man with long hair and a bearded face. 'Jesus Christ' Criticizes Tim Tebow on SNL.'Shi' Comic Book Artist: Jesus Is the World's Greatest Superhero. Iowans Offended by 'Jesus Freak' Comments Made by Professor.Shroud of Turin Date Could Be Confirmed by New Carbon Dating Method.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |